Page 1 of 2
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 12:43 pm
by joffmiester
i've just had a quick look through the angling times and the angling mail and i'm sorry to say the match reports are getting less and less surely the way forward now is to get more and more results on websites ware anglers who fish the matches can put a lot of input in i know ken and tonys hands are tied and the hours they both take on the phones just to get the results just to see them pushed out by advertising >:(
this needs changing not even the winter league final is in the paper >:(and as for the national
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 2:47 pm
by bill yards
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 3:00 pm
by joffmiester
its very poor this week bill 71 pages and my be 3 pages of results
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 3:05 pm
by Woodhouse
Tell him man balls Tony...i would.
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 3:07 pm
by joffmiester
how else can i fill my day
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 3:17 pm
by lloydy
used to buy times and mail every week aint bought one now for years both papers deteriated when changed to tuesday.
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 4:25 pm
by Dodge
The Angling Times match coverage has been very poor for a number of years..... it is almost non existant now apart from a few meaningless 20 / 30 peg knock ups on commercials !!!!
Why dont they cover the top matches / leagues in depth region by region ?? surely this would give team fishing and sponsors etc a much needed boost and possibly more match anglers on the banks and more teams competing in winter leagues etc ........
It seems to me that the AT is more interested in club and pleasure anglers
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 4:39 pm
by joffmiester
i think they are the ones buying it mate
cheers
pub time its too hot for work
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 5:08 pm
by Woodhouse
i think they are the ones buying it mate
cheers
pub time its too hot for work
Has that bloke sorted that dog out yet?
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 5:20 pm
by Woodhouse
It seems to me that the AT is more interested in club and pleasure anglers
95% of people that buy magazines ARE club and pleasure anglers...if any magazine focused purely on open match anglers they would soon be out of business.....
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 5:20 pm
by bill yards
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 5:29 pm
by bill yards
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 5:31 pm
by Woodhouse
Dont let them upset you Tony......
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 5:34 pm
by Dodge
It seems to me that the AT is more interested in club and pleasure anglers
95% of people that buy magazines ARE club and pleasure anglers...if any magazine focused purely on open match anglers they would soon be out of business.....
There are a lot of match anglers tho = more readers and more sold AT`s
Its there loss .... i aint arsed
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 5:41 pm
by bill yards
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 5:46 pm
by Woodhouse
its very poor this week bill 71 pages and my be 3 pages of results
Perhaps if people bought the mags instead of reading them in shops they wouldn't need to have so many adverts...
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 5:50 pm
by bill yards
Mr Woodhouse,
Could I nominate a shop in Leicester as one of your raffle prizes please?
Bill
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 5:55 pm
by Woodhouse
sorry to say
Posted: July 15th, 2008, 6:34 pm
by me
i stopped buy all angling mags/ papers a few years ago as i was fed up with over 1/2 the mag being full of nothing but adverts.
sorry to say
Posted: July 16th, 2008, 10:04 am
by joffmiester
Mr Woodhouse,
Could I nominate a shop in Leicester as one of your raffle prizes please?
Bill
it was only because i was board in the shop tony that i picked it up 2 minutes later i put it down along with the A/T in the end i made do with the grocer magazine just to check on what i need to put up this week