Changes ??????
Posted: March 13th, 2017, 10:12 pm
Fellow Marsh AC members,
I was just thinking about any ways we could change the way the pools are paid out on the matches. I know we do NOT fish Marsh matches for monetary gain(I know it costs me a lot more to fish than I would gain)and a lot of members are on a pension so I am NOT thinking of increasing the pools on the matches.
Thought number 1
A couple of thoughts were only having two sections paying out a max of £10 per section. The balance going towards a golden peg which is drawn out at the end of the match by the winner, if not drawn it rolls over to a max of £20?25 when an additional peg is drawn is out making two chances. If still not drawn at £40/45 a third peg is drawn and so on until it is won. If the pot gets to the stage where there is more money in the pot than anglers would normally pay in, then no one would pay peg fees and pools for the next match. Then starts again.
Thought number 2
A Knock-Out competition starting in week Two until there is a winner. The reason week two is that a lot of anglers do not go on the forum and we can speak to them on the first match.Still changing the sections to paying out 2 sections, but the balance going towards the Knock-Out competition. Based on 16 anglers in the competition it should take about 5 matches to complete.
Thought number 3
A Pairs competition to run for the remainder of the season after the Knock Out Competition. This can be blind pairs matches, so you do not know your partner until the last match where all will be revealed before you start fishing. Based on combined weight from previous qualifying matches and the last match. Dependant on how much is in the kitty Winners and Runners Up could be paid out
Before anyone thinks I am trying to do this for personal gain I must say that I will not be fishing all the Marsh Matches this year due to fishing festivals at Stafford Moor and Viaduct Fisheries, so will be probably not be in a position to get to any of the finals. But I would still compete.
These are my thoughts but I am one among many, Please discuss and let me know what you think.
I was just thinking about any ways we could change the way the pools are paid out on the matches. I know we do NOT fish Marsh matches for monetary gain(I know it costs me a lot more to fish than I would gain)and a lot of members are on a pension so I am NOT thinking of increasing the pools on the matches.
Thought number 1
A couple of thoughts were only having two sections paying out a max of £10 per section. The balance going towards a golden peg which is drawn out at the end of the match by the winner, if not drawn it rolls over to a max of £20?25 when an additional peg is drawn is out making two chances. If still not drawn at £40/45 a third peg is drawn and so on until it is won. If the pot gets to the stage where there is more money in the pot than anglers would normally pay in, then no one would pay peg fees and pools for the next match. Then starts again.
Thought number 2
A Knock-Out competition starting in week Two until there is a winner. The reason week two is that a lot of anglers do not go on the forum and we can speak to them on the first match.Still changing the sections to paying out 2 sections, but the balance going towards the Knock-Out competition. Based on 16 anglers in the competition it should take about 5 matches to complete.
Thought number 3
A Pairs competition to run for the remainder of the season after the Knock Out Competition. This can be blind pairs matches, so you do not know your partner until the last match where all will be revealed before you start fishing. Based on combined weight from previous qualifying matches and the last match. Dependant on how much is in the kitty Winners and Runners Up could be paid out
Before anyone thinks I am trying to do this for personal gain I must say that I will not be fishing all the Marsh Matches this year due to fishing festivals at Stafford Moor and Viaduct Fisheries, so will be probably not be in a position to get to any of the finals. But I would still compete.
These are my thoughts but I am one among many, Please discuss and let me know what you think.